I just listened to Chip Kelly’s press conference. Some answers are available now.
- Blount has “academic and behavioral ladders he has to climb” in order to become eligible to play. Kelly declined to give specifics about what those might be.
- Kelly says the earliest possible time Blount could play is the Stanford game. That puts to rest all the USC drama.
- “I am not reinstating LeGarrette Blount right now.”
- Sociologist Harry Edwards came to Eugene on September 15th. He spoke with the entire team. I wish there was a recording of those meetings.
- Kelly addressed the timing of the announcement: He says this was the first week of school, and there are academic issues he has to address. Kelly said the thing he wrestled with the most in recent weeks was when to make the announcement. He says a plan crystallized last Friday. I think you have to take him at his word here.
- On why he didn’t suspend Blount indefinitely: Kelly said he had to understand the ramifications of his actions. He said if he started with four games and Blount didn’t take it seriously, there would be no way to increase the suspension. He said if he left a return open, the team would face a “cloud of doubt” about whether Blount would return.
- Some media outlets, and myself wondered whether this plan has been in the works from the beginning: “We’re not hiding anything…This isn’t a clandestine operation….This is about a human being.” Kelly’s tone here was a bit frosty.
- On why Blount hasn’t come forward: “It’s not about words, it’s about actions. That’s why he’s been mum, and that’s why he’ll continue to be mum.”
Chip Kelly spoke directly and with purpose. This is what we have come to expect from the new Duck coach. It’s clear Kelly does not care whatsoever how this plays out across the country. He says he doesn’t care about Public Relations. Kelly says he had a process in place after the incident, they went through the process, and he’s been impressed with Blount’s commitment. Kelly said calling and apologizing to Boise State coach Chris Petersen was entirely Blount’s idea. That impressed Kelly.
Many folks criticized Kelly’s reaction in Boise as “knee-jerk.” Last night and this morning many analysts had similar knee-jerk reactions (myself included). Kelly still insists this is a “teachable moment.”
There is no guarantee that Blount will play again. After listening to Chip Kelly, it’s clear he cares not what anybody thinks about this issue. Dude’s got some serious balls.
Despite Kelly’s assertions, I really want to hear what LeGarrette has to say. I want to hear the tone of his voice, I want to hear what he learned from Dungy, Gruden, Edwards, et al. I want to know what he learned from this situation. This seems like a logical progression.
What do you guys and gals think? Did Chip Kelly handle this well? Do you have any other questions? What do you want to hear from LeGarrette Blount?


