Jan 042010

While the depleted Blazers have continued to surpass everyone’s expectations, winning eight of their last 10 games, I have maintained that as long as Brandon Roy is in the game Portland has a good shot at winning. While the Los Angeles Clippers couldn’t keep Roy off the floor tonight, they made a concerted effort to center their whole defensive scheme around him. The fronted him, brought double teams when he received the ball, and used Chris Kaman and Marcus Camby to help off of their man to deny Roy the ball or help out once he received the rock. While this strategy often freed up other Blazers for wide-open looks, it was successful in disrupting Roy’s rhythm – holding him to just 6 points (on 3-12 shooting).  Without a reliable Roy to turn to in the fourth quarter, the Blazers’ offense became stagnant and eventually led to a 105-95 loss.

That isn’t to say that tonight’s game was without bright spots. For the first three quarters, the Blazers played up-tempo, free-flowing, and inspiring basketball. With Roy’s struggles, the Blazers saw several players step up to keep Portland in this game.

Andre Miller, in particular, was fantastic tonight. Dueling with Baron Davis all-night, Miller had an electrifying first half (10 points and 10 assists) and finished with a 22 point and 16 assist evening. We saw Miller stealing passes, finishing at the rim, and making great decisions with the basketball. Not a bad return for the L.A. native and former Clipper.

Martell Webster had his second great game in a row, finishing with 25 points (5-9 from downtown). He was also active on the fastbreak, and was the recipient of two Miller passes that resulted in emphatic dunks. Webster is proving that when he gets consistent minutes he is capable of being a significant contributor. After scoring 17 first-half points, he was a bit more quiet in the second half. Webster again proved to be a player who thrives on positive team momentum when the defenses have to key on other players (like Roy, Miller, etc.), allowing him to find the open spot on the floor or the open cutting lane.

The other truly notable Blazer tonight was Juwan Howard. He did a great job of knocking down open mid-range shots when his defender would leave to help on Brandon Roy. At one point, Chris Kaman looked to coach Mike Dunleavy in dismay as if to say “Coach, if we keep doing this Juwan is going to have the night of his life.” While it wasn’t the night of his life, it was definitely one of his most productive games as a Blazer. In 36 minutes of play, Howard chipped in 16 points (8-11 shooting) and four boards. He also had one of the best highlights his aging career. Roy drove baseline drawing in Kaman and Camby, dished it off to a cutting Howard who threw down a posterizing dunk on Kaman. Posterizing is not an overexaggeration.

In the end, the Blazers just didn’t have enough in the tank to finish of the Clippers. Their hot start fizzled, and their defense became absent, but the Blazers gave an admirable effort given the players they had available. I think we can excuse an out-of-the-ordinary performance from Roy, who had averaged 27.2 ppg, 5.1 rpg and 4.9 apg throughout the month of December.

The Blazers won’t have to wait long for a chance to bounce back from tonight’s loss, as the Memphis Grizzlies come to town tomorrow. LaMarcus Aldridge is expecting to make his return, which should alleviate some pressure off of Roy, but I would imagine his mobility will still be somewhat limited if he does play. Still, the Blazers will welcome Aldridge back with open arms if only to have another big in their lineup. We’ll see if the second night of a back-to-back shows a fatigued Blazers squad, or if they approach it as an opportunity for redemption.

Posted by Stu Holdren Tagged with: , , ,
Nov 072009
Steve Blake of the Portland Trail Blazers

Leading up to the season, one of the greatest positional debates for the Blazers was at the point guard position, with fans everywhere arguing the merits of starting either Steve Blake or Andre Miller: Blake, the proven starter who helped lead the team to a 54-win season last year with a shooting touch that complements the game of Brandon Roy perfectly, and Miller, the prize acquisition of the offseason with a keen sense for running an offense and getting his teammates involved. However, given Miller’s limited shooting range, his style of play was often questioned as far as how it would be utilized alongside Roy.

Steve Blake began the season the starter, and while his play couldn’t be directly attributed to the team’s slow start, the team has clearly been trying to track down its collective identity. Coming off the bench, Miller struggled with his shot in Portland’s stagnant offense, but has effectively managed the pace of the game and has been successfully getting his teammates involved.

Needing a change in the on-court dynamic, Nate McMillan tweaked the starting lineup yesterday against the Spurs in a highly unexpected way. He started Miller at point guard…and Blake as well. While a two point-guard backcourt is somewhat unorthodox, it addressed McMillan’s desire to get more ball-movement and speed on the floor. The new-lineup worked to perfection as the Blazers launched out to a 29-14 lead. Although the move seemed to address some of the glaring weaknesses of the early season, this change has deeper implications for the rest of the year.

I think the Blazers know what they have in Miller, and they also know that they haven’t been getting the most out of his talents. I think they know how deadly they could be if they could figure out how to find the best way to utilize Miller and Roy on the floor together (a pairing that has been nothing short of awkward thus far). I think that Miller has yet to find his comfort level within this team, and it is having an adverse effect on his shooting touch.

It seems as though Miller still doesn’t quite know where he fits in, what his role is, or what he has to do to put the team in the best position to win. Miller has always been the starter, the play-maker and the initiator. We saw McMillan preaching to his squad to play fast and push the ball up the floor, something that Miller can and will do if given more freedom within the offense. I would imagine that the Miller-Blake tandem start is likely a short-term adjustments to increase the comfort level of Miller and buffer his eventual transition to the sole starting point guard on this team. Blake is still there as a beacon of consistency, an outside shooting threat, and a familiar face for Roy to defer to when he gets caught in a jam. Miller can mentally approach the game as a starter and have an immediate impact on the game’s tempo from the opening tip. I think you will see that as Miller’s minutes increase, so will his shooting percentages. We’ll also begin to see more of those crafty moves and creative finishes in the paint.

I’ve always believed that Blake is the perfect back-up point guard in this league. That isn’t to say that he hasn’t been a good starter for the Blazers or that he isn’t a good fit in the lineup. He’s a great team player who knocks down the shots he’s supposed to, always plays hard and can direct the offense seamlessly.  Blake is also the type of player who will accept his role and will make the most of it whether that is in the starting lineup or coming off of the bench. However it ends up, Blake will play an incredibly important role for the Blazers this season. Still, I think the Blazers owe it to themselves to give Miller a real chance at being successful – and take this team to another level.

It will be interesting to see how long Blake and Miller continue to start alongside one another. It could even come to a stop tomorrow against the Minnesota Timberwolves who start the 6′9″ Corey Brewer at shooting guard. Regardless, don’t be surprised to see the Blazers continue to put these two point guards on the floor together when the situation allows. The sooner the Blazers can define their players’ roles and decide how they want to play this year, the sooner they can return to their winning ways.

Posted by Stu Holdren Tagged with: , , , , ,
Oct 122009

Fellow sports fans.  It’s been too long since we’ve podcasted.  We know you missed it.  The return of the Three Guys on a Couch Podcast is somewhat abbreviated (of course that’s a lie) but jam-packed with juicy insight.  Click here for Audio. We discussed the following:

- UO’s huge win against UCLA

- Nate Costa’s workmanlike and completely adequate effort

- UO’s plug and play defense can’t be doubted now (roughly 5 minutes in)

- LaMichael James and Kenjon Barner’s improvement

- Jacquizz showing Toby Gerhart who rules the Pac-10 Running Back contest (10ish minutes in)

- Sean Canfield spreading the wealth around, but still getting hit a lot

- How LaMichael James stacks up against Quizz right now

- The Beavs have USC’s attention, but is USC ready for the Beavs?

- Andre Miller vs. The Oregonian sports page (roughly 20 minutes in, this was a good chat)

- Miller’s persona and how it matters not

- General Blazers preseason banter

- Chris Dudley for Governor?   The Republicans are desperate in Oregon…but Duds is a great guy.

Again, you can find the audio here.

Thanks for tuning in and checking out the site.  Keep coming back for more!

Posted by Andrew Theen Tagged with: , , , , ,